We run one of your vendor's scrapes ourselves, compare it head-to-head, and hand you the gaps: what's missing, why, and the evidence. Yours to keep and verify. Free.
Start with only a URL, instructions, and 5–20 sample rows. No system access. No vendor contact. NDA welcome.
Missing data is silent.
Spot-checks catch errors in what your vendor delivers. They can't catch what isn't there. Samples are blind to absences by design. Only an independent comparison surfaces them.
How do you know your vendor's deliveries are 100% accurate?
How do you know what they didn't get?
If they can't scrape a site, could someone else unlock that revenue?
Could someone do this cheaper, with modern approaches, and catch more than your current vendor?
The Gap Audit answers all four, and hands you the proof. →
No black box. Here's the exact procedure, so you can judge the test up front and re-check our numbers against your own delivery after.
Your URL list and instructions, run against the live source independently — no contact with your vendor's pipeline. Two independent pulls of the same ground truth.
Record by record, field by field — every absence, every missing field, every value that disagrees. You start with a sample; the full comparison needs the vendor's last delivery, which you send once we begin.
A dropped-record check catches every silent absence; LLM-assisted sampling concentrates human review on the records most likely to be wrong. We tell you exactly which records were checked, and how.
In-scope against in-scope only, de-duplicated, same time window. If the gap shrinks to zero under a fair comparison, the report says so.
Every number in the report is built on this bar. A record counts only when all of it holds — otherwise it doesn't go in our favor.
More in-scope providers than the previous vendor on a 1.2M+ record nationwide dataset, like-for-like (1,212K → 1,291K). The same 5%+ pattern recurs across similar state directories.
Read the Case Study → Accuracy & completenessSources delivered without the identifier needed to match records. The vendor said it couldn't be pulled. It was hidden in the page. We extracted it, lifting accuracy and completeness.
Read the Case Study → Revenue unlockThe audit found three high-value sources missing from the client's data entirely. We made all three viable ($10,000 per run down to $1,500) and unlocked about $15,000/month in new revenue they could sell.
Read the Case Study → Quality assuranceFewer listing errors, cut from 5% to 2%. We scraped every listing, flagged image and size mismatches with AI, and sent the edge cases to human review.
Read the Case Study →Illustrative structure, not real client data. Every figure in your report traces to rows like these — each with the live source URL, so you can re-check any one of them yourself.
| Vendor record | Dataweav record | Source URL | Field issue | Why it counts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Missing | Present | example.com/provider/123 | Provider omitted | Live page, in-scope state, matches schema |
| Present | Present | example.com/provider/456 | Identifier missing | Hidden ID found in the page source |
| Present | Excluded | example.com/provider/789 | Out of scope | Different state / duplicate / stale — not counted |
We run one of your vendor's scrapes independently and hand you the findings: what's missing, why, and the evidence. Yours to keep and verify.
A 30-minute live review of the findings: what's missing, why it matters, and what it's worth fixing. No obligation to go further.
Where you want it closed, we re-engineer the broken scrapes and re-run the audit so the gap can't reopen silently.
When it makes sense, we run the scrape end-to-end: our own infrastructure, the dual-layer QA bundled in, priced as a swap, not another line item.
Not a teaser. The Gap Audit report is the deliverable, and it's yours to keep. Below is a redacted sample from a real engagement: the gap, the cause, the evidence trail, and the per-source breakdown you can verify against your own delivery.
View the sample report →Every figure above is traceable to the row-level appendix, so you can re-run the comparison yourself.
Run by the operators behind 400+ live scraping sites. You'll review the findings with the people who built the audit — not an SDR.
Best fit: teams already paying for recurring scraped data — not one-off jobs.
The audit and its findings are free and yours to keep: what's missing, why, and the evidence. Verify it and walk away if you like. The paid part is the managed service: we take over the scraping, fix what's missing, and ship the bundled QA on every delivery going forward.
You'll catch it, because every figure is traceable to row-level evidence you can re-check at the source. The dropped-record check catches what spot-checks miss, and the report tells you why in plain language.
You don't need new budget. The audit is free, and the managed service replaces your current vendor's line item. We price comparable and bundle the QA at no premium. A swap, not an addition.
We send the report and walk you through it: what's missing, why, and what it's worth fixing. The 30-minute walkthrough is where the value lands. The report stands on its own whether you proceed or not.
Next step
Free. Ten business days. We run one of your vendor's scrapes, hand you the findings to verify yourself, and walk you through them. Worst case: you learn your current setup is fine, and you keep the report anyway.